Text-to-Image
Evaluate image generation models on photorealism, prompt adherence, compositional understanding, typography, style control, and artifact detection across 6 leading models.
Lobster Test
"A lobster riding a dirt bike" — can the model compose two unrelated concepts in a novel spatial relationship?
“A lobster riding a dirt bike”
Scoring Rubric
| Metric | 1 (Low) | 5 (High) |
|---|---|---|
| Photorealism | Obviously fake / incoherent | Indistinguishable from photo |
| Prompt Adherence | Ignores prompt | Every element present and correct |
| Composition | Objects randomly placed | Correct spatial relationships |
| Typography | No readable text | Perfect text rendering |
| Style Control | Wrong style entirely | Nails the requested style |
| Artifacts | Major artifacts (mangled hands, extra limbs) | No detectable artifacts |
Models Tracked
GPT-4o (native)
APIOpenAI — native LLM image generation
Midjourney v7
UI OnlyDiscord/web UI — no reliable API
Flux 1.1 Pro
APIBlack Forest Labs via Replicate/fal.ai
Ideogram 2.0
APIBest-in-class text rendering
Imagen 3
APIGoogle via Vertex AI
Recraft V3
APIStrong on design/vector
Metrics Evaluated
Prompt adherenceCompositional accuracyVisual fidelityText renderingArtifact score